<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InputDraw package version 1.31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/</link>
	<description>web, tech, development, music, photos, work.. mixtape of thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:33:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tiagocardoso</title>
		<link>http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>tiagocardoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Graham, you&#039;re right of course...
I had this version all set and ready to go and on the last minute I decided to compile it with the last version of OpenLaszlo.
It&#039;s not that this version did something wrong, but it does several things (like views width and height) on a different way. Maybe it was just a bug fixed that I had a workaround.

I&#039;m developing version 1.4. It will have lot&#039;s of new custom options and some differences regarding licenses and watermarks.. just wait.. Soon....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, you&#8217;re right of course&#8230;<br />
I had this version all set and ready to go and on the last minute I decided to compile it with the last version of OpenLaszlo.<br />
It&#8217;s not that this version did something wrong, but it does several things (like views width and height) on a different way. Maybe it was just a bug fixed that I had a workaround.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m developing version 1.4. It will have lot&#8217;s of new custom options and some differences regarding licenses and watermarks.. just wait.. Soon&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Simmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tiagocardoso.eu/mainada/inputdraw/2007/12/23/inputdraw-package-version-131/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi we are evaluating InputDraw for use within an ASP.NET page.

The latest version here is a great improvement on the previous version.

However we have now lost the &quot;Clear&quot; buttons from the top right hand corner. Any chance of restoring them?

Being able to set the default &quot;pen stroke&quot; is a great new feature but it would be nice to still have access to the palette?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi we are evaluating InputDraw for use within an ASP.NET page.</p>
<p>The latest version here is a great improvement on the previous version.</p>
<p>However we have now lost the &#8220;Clear&#8221; buttons from the top right hand corner. Any chance of restoring them?</p>
<p>Being able to set the default &#8220;pen stroke&#8221; is a great new feature but it would be nice to still have access to the palette?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
